The fake xp problem - Martin Whybrow
Have you ever faced fake xp problem ? I've recently built
a new PC and needed a copy of Windows XP Professional to load
onto it. I found an advert on Gumtree for a copy of XP Pro
OEM, exactly what I needed, so I emailed the seller who
confirmed he had one available. I sent the cheque and waited
for weeks for it to arrrive; finally I became fed up with
waiting and found a copy on eBay, the listing stated it was
genuine (no less than 48 times) so I bid on and won it. The
copy bought on eBay arrived within the week and the copy
bought via the Gumtree adverts arrived several days after
that.
As I already had a
copy of XP Pro SP2, I didn't bother opening the package but
decided to use my original disk and the COA key number from
the package I'd just won on eBay; the installer wouldn't
accept the key number which was odd as both copies were XP SP2
OEM versions. I contacted the seller who told me that I
would have to use the disk from the package, so I used that
and the installation went well but did not ask me to activate
Windows at the end of the process (OEM and retail versions
must always be activated, VLM versions do not need
activating). When I ran windows update, I was shocked to see
that the installation had failed the Windows Genuine
validation process (see below).

I decided to investigate the COA key number and
by Googling, found many references to the file SETUPP.INI
which resides in the i386 directory of the XP CD, so I decided
to compare what was on this CD and compare it to my original
CD:
eBay copy SETUPP.INI file:
[Pid]
ExtraData=796674736977656D7A622E385892A4
Pid=55274270
Genuine copy SETUPP.INI file:
[Pid]
ExtraData=786F687170637175716954806365EF
Pid=76487OEM
According to the information that I found, the
OEM section in the 2nd line of the genuine copy's SETUPP.INI
file points to this being an OEM version (no surprise there)
but the 270 in the same place in the file from the eBay CD
indicates it's a Volume License version; at this point I was
certain that I'd been sold a fake copy of XP as all the
markings indicate that this should be an OEM version. I then
started to compare the CDs, packaging and the handbook to
confirm my suspicions that this was indeed a counterfeit copy.
Below are a series of images comparing various aspects of the
counterfeit copy against the genuine item:

The fake COA, clearly showing the OEM marking
(click image for larger view)
Compare this to a genuine COA on Microsoft's How to tell
webpages. This COA passes most of the tests including the
hologram strip being embedded into the COA.

Close up
view of the fake COA, notice the creases where it's stuck to
the back of the wrapper because there is no plastic backing
behind it

View of
the fake package, note the red star stuck on the wrapper may
be present on genuine versions although the one I have does
not have this

The CD
sleeve .
Note the SP2
sticker; my genuine copy has this printed on the sleeve as
below:

Genuine XP
SP2 OEM CD sleeve

The fake
inner hologram label is a sticker stuck onto the CD
.
Notice how a piece of card
catches the edge of the sticker as you run it across, the
ridge is thick enough to detect with a fingernail through the
CD sleeve and the package wrapper. This is about the best test
that you can make to detect a fake copy whilst it's still in
its wrapper. The main CD hologram label is also a sticker but
it's much more difficult to detect and I couldn't feel the
edge with the CD in its sleeve. See below for a genuine
CD:

The
genuine CD label .
Notice
how the inner holgram appears to be a part of the main
hologram with a much less pronounced edge than the fake one
above.

The fake
CD label .
Notice the
creases in the label indicating that it is stuck onto the CD.
On a genuine Windows CD, the hologram label is part of the top
surface of the disk and not stuck on.

The fake
CD showing the Windows flag hologram
Notice how the panel containing the flag
hologram appears to stand out from the rest of the surrounding
hologram and also that the edges of the earth image inside the
panel are misaligned with the earth image in the surrounding
hologram. Another feature you may notice is the 'GENUINE' text
above the flag panel with 'XP' at right angles; these 2
hologram details should never be visible at the same time.
Compare this to the genuine CD below:

The
genuine CD showing the Windows flag hologram

The
genuine CD showing the text 'GENUINE'
Notice that the 'GENUINE' text is visible
without the 'XP', the 'XP' text is only visible by tilting the
CD and is never visible at the same time as the 'GENUINE'
text.

1st view
of the Windows flag hologram

2nd view
of Windows flag hologram from a different angle
.
The flag and surrounding
image should be a 3D image, so the clouds and the TM mark
should move relative to the flag as the disk is tilted; in
this case there is no apparent movement.

Partial
view of the fake handbook's front cover .
Compare the quality of the printing to the
genuine handbook below:

Partial
view of the genuine handbook's front cover (click image for
larger view).
Notice how
much sharper the text is, especially in the 'start'
button.

View of
the Microsoft logo on the front of the fake
handbook.
Compare this to
the genuine handbook below:

View of
the Microsoft logo on the genuine handbook
.
Again, notice how much
sharper the text appears compared to the fake
one.

View of
the microtype on the back cover of the fake handbook
.
According to Microsft's
website, most fakes have a solid line instead of microtype
here; obviously the fakes are improving. Compare this to the
genuine handbook below:

View of
the microtype on the back cover of the genuine handbook
.
It's difficult to
tell because my camera doesn't do good close up shots, but the
microtype is sharper on the genuine handbook.

Pictures
of the inside front and rear covers of the fake handbook
.
Compare the printing
quality to the genuine handbook below:

Pictures
of the inside front and rear covers of the genuine handbook
.
Notice the much beeter
print quality, especially in the shadow underneat the window;
the fake handbook shows a significant amount of noise
(graininess) in this area whereas
the shadows are smooth
in the genuine handbook. Also, you'll notice how much sharper
the text is on the genuine handbook.

Finally,
guess which is the genuine handbook .
OK, so the image name is a clue but do you
really think Microsoft would allow glaring printing errors
like the one on the right to leave the printers? Again, you
will notice
how much clearer the text is in the genuine
handbook.
Printing is an
expensive process, high quality printing is even more so (I
know because I work in the pre-press industry). The genuine
Microsoft handbooks are printed using
at least 6 colours
that I can identify, the fake is printed using what appears to
be a conventional 4 colour (CMYK) process. The registration of
the printing (accurate alignment
of the various coloured
dots make up the image) is excellent on the genuine article
but is poor on the counterfeit copy; good registration takes
time and good quality equipment
to achieve, clearly the
counterfeiters do not have access to or do not want to spend
the money to use good equipment and a skilled press
operator.
The best way to avoid fake windows issue is to buy a brand computer from a reputed brand that will bring you a licence copy of windows. Like DELL. Click here to see what you can get.